Oscillating corona preionizer test

Note: at any picture you can click and magnify to 1024 x 768 pix


I was got amazing idea to make one test for future work with preionizer for TEA lasers.
I call it "oscillating corona preionizer", because instead only one corona pulse I want get
more corona pulses before main discharge in laser channel (with significant delay between
corona preionizing UV light and main discharge). This delay I want because I think that
electrons haven't enough time to escape from cathode surface by photoelectric effect
before main discharge in laser channel. In "classic" laser setup, I think this delay is very short.
Because haven't chance to measure this delay with some instruments like oscilloscope, I will
make more experiments until get laser plasma in laser channel without any white sparks and
maybe with more output power.

Before apply this new setup to my new laser head, I was make decision to firstly make few
experiments to confirm my idea, and I was got some "proof", but until this setup implement in
"right" laser head, I only guess is it work as I planned.

Idea is simple: make another spark gap, add one coil to preionizing corona wire and power
it with shorter coaxial cable than cable to laser head to achieve some delay between corona
and main discharge. Aside longer cable to laser head, I was try put little ferrite bead with few
turns after Marx generator and before cable to laser head. Tonight I was make few experiments
with separately laser head (as dummy load) and corona preionizing test setup. Only by looking
at all pictures in next table you can make some conclusions, because was not make any "right"
electrical or optical measurement.



First test with 6 turns on ferrite bead for delaying pulse to laser head





In diagram above called "corona test" is actually same principle how it work in "classic" laser setup: when pulse arrive through spark gap, very small capacitance between corona preionizer's glass tube and anode charge and "jumping" electrons then make ionized gas, which occur as UV and visible light. But this charging stop when voltage between laser electrodes reach enough value to make discharge as laser plasma. Now, you can see how is in this case corona discharge weak. In background is yellow fluorescence spot illuminated by UV light from TEA laser beam.
Because Marx generator gave only about 600 milli Joules which lead to laser head, I was "pull" only about 60 milli Joules from this power to corona test setup through small capacitance "Ct" of 140 pF. This "stolen" energy not decrease laser beam too much, but only little. I think that SG2 make spark little earlier before SG1 (because of delaying circuit). This small amount of electrical power or energy magnetize coil and charge small capacitance between anode and preionizer's glass tube. First pulse is stronger and make first corona pulse, but then coil begin to demagnetize and reverse voltage (self inductance) to preionizer and make another corona pulse and reverse charge capacitance. Now, because of reversed charged small capacitance discharge through coil, it make again magnetization in opposite direction. It occur as sustained oscillation which decrease it's magnitude after few pulses. But this few pulses is much better than only one like in "classic" laser setup.

Now, you can see difference in brightness between this two corona lights.
(little blue line in front of setup at pictures)



Because of so fast oscillating (read: high frequency), I can't make measurement with my poor oscilloscope.
But I was make another setup with lower frequency to show you how looks this sustained oscillations:
(still, picture is very bad, but haven't chance make better one, like with digital scope which I haven't)





Second test without ferrite bead from Marx generator to cable.
(I hope that longer cable itself make delayed pulse)





I was remove ferrite bead between Marx generator and cable which lead to laser head. There is not much difference like in first table above. This mean, that we can make delay only with longer cable, but I'm not sure yet until make new laser head and apply this setup.
Once again, laser pulse behind corona test setup is not much decreased in intensity. I think that this is because I was "stolen" only about 10% of energy from laser with capacitor "Ct" of 140 pF. And, as it was at pictures in table above, corona light is again brighter than at picture in left column.



Later was make another experiment, with "Ct" capacitor of 500 pF. Corona is not much
brighter, but laser pulse from TEA laser head is almost totally suppressed. This is because
I was "stolen" about 200 milli Joules, which is 1/3 of whole energy from Marx generator.
Laser still operate, but now with much lower output power. Before finally conclusion, look
at this picture how is badly decreased laser output (little yellow spot behind corona test setup):





Little conclusion: I _think_ that my idea work, but without right proof with applied this setup in
new laser head I can't make enough "strong" decided statement that I'm right. This idea have one
little disadvantage - if pulled energy from Marx generator to corona preionizer is too high, then
laser can't operate with full power. But, I still believe that my current Marx generator have too
low output power, and when I pull too much energy to preionizer then laser fail. I hope soon make
better Marx generator with much more power, and then corona preionizer will need only few
percent of whole output power from this unit.